Connect with us

Business

Walmart declared a ban on the sale of e-cigarettes

Catherina Ploumidakis

Published

on

Walmart declared a ban on sale of e-cigarettes

Walmart Inc, the giant US retailer declared a ban on the sale of e-cigarettes and Electronic Nicotine in any of its stores in the United States. The sudden stop is due to elevated death reports of young adults using vaping products.

On Friday, the Walmart employees received a memorandum that stated the concern of the company as the young adults engage in vape-smoking. The subsequent result of e-cigarettes can be seen in the number of deaths and lung diseases reported a month ago.

The entire state is in dilemma as the regulations and guidelines for vape-smoking at local, state and federal levels are not clear. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) projects the rate of vaping-related lung disease

. The acute cases have risen from 380 to 530 cases. The mysterious health hazard of vaping has caused the death of eight people.

On Thursday, the US Food and Drug Administration took a deep insight into the averments of the serious illness. The department has taken vaping products for examination to find the presence of dangerous substances.

They can be either cannabinoids, poisons, opioids, pesticides, nicotine and other health crating traces. Immediate steps are undertaken to administer the use of vaping products in the United States. President Donald Trump has declared to get away with all flavored e-vapes or cigarettes from the stores selling it. As such, Walmart has taken the due action on Friday by labeling a ban on the sale of vaping products.

According to the sources, young adults belonging to the age group of 18 to 25 are the major sufferers. The decision of a congressional subcommittee will come up with accurate information on the ban of e-cigarettes.

Catherina previously worked as a journalist for several local newspapers until she realized the potential of internet for news reporting. She joined the team as a contributor which provided her a platform to dedicate her experience and knowledge for a wider range of audience. She excels in curating business news for the website.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

LVMH wants to renegotiate $16.2 billion Tiffany deal

Erin Fox

Published

on

LVMH wants to renegotiate $16.2 billion Tiffany deal

LVMH Chief Executive Bernard Arnault is exploring ways to reopen negotiations on the French luxury goods giant’s $16.2 billion acquisition of jewelry chain Tiffany & Co, as US social unrest and the coronavirus pandemic weigh on the retail sector, people familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.

LVMH agreed to acquire Tiffany in November, but the deal has yet to close, pending regulatory approvals. Arnault said at the time that Tiffany would “thrive for centuries to come” under LVMH.

Arnault has been in talks with his advisers this week to identify ways to pressure Tiffany to lower the agreed deal price of $135 per share, the sources said. He is considering whether he can argue that the New York-based company is in breach of its obligations under the merger agreement, they said.

LVMH has not yet settled on a strategy to pursue a deal price cut and has not asked Tiffany to reopen negotiations, according to the sources. It is not clear whether it will do so, and what arguments it could pursue.

Tiffany does not believe there is a legal basis to renegotiate the deal, the sources said. The company is in compliance with financial covenants under the merger agreement with LVMH, and expects to remain so after declaring a quarterly dividend two weeks ago, the sources said.

The sources asked not to be identified because the deliberations, first reported on Tuesday by fashion trade publication WWD, are confidential.

LVMH declined to comment. Tiffany did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

While Arnault now has concerns about overpaying for Tiffany, he still believes in the deal’s strategic rationale, according to the sources.

Tiffany will give LVMH a bigger share of the lucrative US market and expand its offerings in jewelry, the fastest-growing sector in the luxury goods industry.

Were Tiffany to rebuff LVMH’s bid to reopen the deal, their dispute could end up in Delaware court, the sources said. An acrimonious end to the deal would make it more difficult for LVMH to make another attempt at acquiring Tiffany in the future, they said.

Several acquirers have walked away from or renegotiated deals in the wake of the pandemic. In the retail sector, private equity firm Sycamore Partners walked away from a $525 million deal to acquire a majority stake in L Brands’ Victoria’s Secret.

Consultancy Bain expects global sales of high-end clothing, handbags, jewelry and cosmetics to fall by up to 35 percent this year, as the health crisis has forced brands to shut shops across the globe and international travel ground to a halt.

The deteriorating market conditions have been compounded for New York-based Tiffany and other retailers by the protests and attacks on shops that have followed the death of George Floyd at the hands of police on May 25.

Tiffany, founded in 1837 and known for its signature robin’s-egg blue boxes, was already in turnaround mode, trying to rejuvenate its image and attract shoppers online. It is due to report first-quarter earnings on Friday.

Continue Reading

Business

France coronavirus death toll over 29,000 By Reuters

Erin Fox

Published

on

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A disinfection squad sprays disinfectant to clean beaches on the Croisette in Cannes
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A disinfection squad sprays disinfectant to clean beaches on the Croisette in Cannes

PARIS (Reuters) – France’s coronavirus death toll rose by 81 on Wednesday, or 0.3%, to reach 29,021, which is the fifth-highest death toll in the world.

The rate of increase has decreased compared to Tuesday, when fatalities were up 0.4%, and the number of people hospitalized for COVID-19 dise ase has continued its long-running decline, the health ministry said in a statement.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Continue Reading

Business

Snapchat will no longer promote posts from President Trump

Erin Fox

Published

on

Snapchat will no longer promote posts from President Trump

Snapchat is following Twitter’s lead in minimizing content from President Trump.

The social network famous for its funny face filters and disappearing photos on Wednesday confirmed to The Post that it would no longer promote Trump’s content on its “Discover” page, which hosts curated content from prominent accounts.

“We will not amplify voices who incite racial violence and injustice by giving them free promotion on Discover,” a spokesperson said. “Racial violence and injustice have no place in our society and we stand together with all who seek peace, love, equality and justice in America.”

The move does not remove any of Trump’s posts from Snapchat’s platform, nor does it block users from seeing anything he has posted. The president’s posts, however, will not be promoted on the platform to anyone who has not opted to follow his account.

Snap’s move arrives a week after Twitter set off a firestorm by flagging two of the president’s tweets about mail-in ballots as misleading and then shielding a tweet about police protests behind the warning label. The latter tweet referred to protesters calling attention to the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police “thugs,” and wanted that “when the looting starts, the shooting starts.” 

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has defended his decision to let Trump’s posts speak for themselves — despite fierce backlash from employees who say the post that warns of shooting people violates its policies.

Twitter’s move prompted Trump to sign an executive order directing federal agencies to look at whether they can place new regulations on tech giants like Twitter, Facebook and Google, which owns Youtube, saying that companies “like Twitter enjoy an unprecedented liability shield based on the theory that they are a neutral platform — which they are not.”

Continue Reading

Trending